Killing Innovation?

Azelaic buy aldactone from canada acid can help to reduce the appearance of bumps, lesions, norvasc sale and swelling that often occur with rosacea. It can be buy cheap zofran used in a diluted form as an essential oil, or store get generic without ampicillin prescription the cooled tea can be applied directly to the skin augmentin online stores with saturated compresses. Otherwise, collagen can be a better option cheap tizanidine no prescription as there is more evidence to suggest it helps improve buy generic aldactone the skin's appearance. The Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America buy generic erythromycin alternative liquid (AAFA) says that people should think about the role eggs buy generic acomplia play in a recipe when choosing an appropriate egg substitute. viagra australia Cymbalta and alcoholIt's possible that Cymbalta and alcohol can interact cheapest amoxicillin and cause damage to your liver. No matter how long griseofulvin buy drug a person has smoked, quitting always brings health benefits, according nexium without prescription to the CDC. Compared to chemotherapy alone, the addition of radiation.

When you sue an architect for problems with an unconventional / original design, are you stomping out innovation? MIT would probably say no, while Frankie G may disagree…

.:via->Bloomberg

Posted: August 26th, 2010
at 5:42am by orangemenace


Categories: sidenote

Comments: 1 comment



 

One Response to 'Killing Innovation?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Killing Innovation?'.

  1. “We’ll never know who was at fault, so no one can learn from it.” – This is what kills innovation.

    Suing an architect who builds a faulty building is just necessary. The alternative is to leave it leaking?

    What’s needed to stop the bashing of famous buildings is communication from the people involved to the press, about what the problems are. If we can all see the design was good then it changes the story.

    Anonymous

    4 Sep 10 at 2:43 pm

     


 

Leave a Reply