Buy Lasix Online Without Prescription

dynamic-architecture-1.jpg Buy lasix online without prescription, Set to be constructed - of course - in Dubai, this skyscraper designed by architect David Fisher rotates by wind power. Generic lasix, But not as a whole - this building rotates by individual floor, creating what Fisher calls 'dynamic architecture', buy lasix from canada. Lasix sale,


Dynamic Architecture buildings keep modifying their shape. As each floor rotates separately, lasix tablets, Buy lasix cheap, the form of the building changes constantly; you may not see the same building twice.


Dynamic architecture marks a new era in architecture. This new approach, order generic lasix, Purchase lasix, based on motion dynamics, is in fact a challenge to traditional architecture that until now was based on gravity, discount lasix without prescription.

Dynamic Architecture buildings will become the symbol of a new philosophy that will change the look of our cities and the concept of living, buy lasix online without prescription. Order lasix no rx, From now on, buildings will have a fourth new dimension TIME, cheap lasix. Lasix online cheap, Buildings will not be confined to rigid shapes; construction will have a new approach and flexibility. Cities will change faster than we ever imagined, lasix uk. Canadian lasix, [David Fisher, from dynamicarchitecture.net]


So I know what you're thinking - incredibly wasteful, lasix generic, Buy generic lasix, right. Not if Fisher is successful in placing horizontal wind turbines between each of the tower's floors - providing 48 turbines to power the building's spinning.


dynamic-architecture-2.jpg Buy lasix online without prescription, In addition to the horizontal turbines, the building is to be fitted with photovoltaic panels on the roof - generating approximately 7 million dollars worth of electricity every year, according to Fisher.
Each turbine can produce 0.3 megawatt of electricity, lasix cheap, Cheap lasix tablet, compared to 1-1.5 megawatt generated by a normal vertical turbine (windmill). Considering that Dubai gets 4, lasix purchase, Cheapest lasix, 000 wind hours annually, the turbines incorporated into the building can generate 1, lasix for sale,200,000 kilowatt-hour of energy.

As average annual power consumption of a family is estimated to be 24,000 kilowatt-hour, each turbine can supply energy for about 50 families. The Dynamic Architecture tower in Dubai will be having 200 apartments and hence four turbines can take care of their energy needs. The surplus clean energy produced by the remaining 44 turbines can light up the neighborhood of the building, buy lasix online without prescription. [David Fisher, from dynamicarchitecture.net]


So, the building doesn't just power itself and it's own spinning/rotating - it can also power its surrounding urban area. My ninja, please...

dynamic-architecture-3.jpg

What's with people and spinning buildings.

::all images and info from dynamicarchitecture.net::.

Similar posts: Medrol without prescription. Megathin without prescription. Mellaril without prescription. Mentat pills without prescription. Methotrexate without prescription. Metronidazole gel without prescription. Micardis without prescription. Microlean without prescription. Mirapex without prescription. Modalert without prescription.
Trackbacks from: Buy lasix online without prescription. Buy zyban without prescription. Hiv test online without prescription. Buy coreg online without prescription. Buy chantix without prescription. Buy opticare ointment without prescription. Buy depakote without prescription. Buy provera without prescription. Methotrexate online without prescription. Buy female pink viagra without prescription.

Posted: May 15th, 2007
at 12:41pm by orangemenace


Categories: architecture,green arch,my ninja, please,towering pagodas

Comments: 68 comments



 

68 Responses to 'Buy Lasix Online Without Prescription'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Buy Lasix Online Without Prescription'.

  1. I should just cave and make a ‘Dubai’ or ‘UAE’ category in archjutsu…or maybe just make the site ABOUT architecture over there. Shit is ridiculous…

    orangemenace

    15 May 07 at 12:46 pm

     

  2.  

  3. Ok.i think its great a building that moves according the wind and the enviroment. Also the using of clean energies.

    As i observe this will be a very luxury and expensive building…This will be possible for normal people? And how long will take our cities can be designed like this building?

    Of course its an amazing preview of what our future could be, if we think about using clean energies applied to architecture

    Carolina Leon Veljovic

    13 Aug 07 at 11:06 pm

     

  4. In addition, would like to know what class of materials uses this building?
    also very ecological?
    Is this building very sustainable?

    Carolina Leon Veljovic

    13 Aug 07 at 11:19 pm

     

  5. It is my belief that suite vollard owns the patent for this technology and David Fisher is infringing on this patent. Be careful if you get involved with Dynamic on any projects.

    Rob

    17 Sep 07 at 10:54 pm

     

  6. awesome building!

    check this link:
    http://www.dynamicarchitecture.net/LARGE.HTML

    krissie

    2 Oct 07 at 8:54 am

     

  7. im spinning around!!! =)

    krissie

    2 Oct 07 at 8:56 am

     

  8. ugly building.

    ugly building

    18 Oct 07 at 12:59 pm

     

  9. great idea. beautiful building

    idacendol

    26 Nov 07 at 11:13 pm

     

  10. wonderful concept

    priya

    27 Jan 08 at 7:31 am

     

  11. apart from this can u tell me that in what way will this building be helpful to mankind??i mean that does it solve any problems related to humans in today’s world???

    Nishant Rai

    3 Feb 08 at 12:45 pm

     

  12. interenting but also very complicated. uses tecnologly that we dont manege very well,so.. the chances of it falling apart are high.

    caroline fint

    3 Feb 08 at 10:04 pm

     

  13. Matured architects say that if this concept comes into being….soon the architects will be replaced by the mechanical engineers…wat say ppl????

    Nishant Rai

    4 Feb 08 at 11:34 pm

     

  14. I agree with Nishant, I don’t believe this building solves anything or would be beneficial to mankind in any way. Sure it looks cool, but why? It’s sort of like a garden follie, looks cool but sort of useless.

    If anything it is detrimental to the environment when you consider the time and energy put into creating it, when there is no extra benefit in the result.

    Kennon B Williams

    10 Feb 08 at 12:24 pm

     

  15. Love the blog, if i may ask, what software are you using? how much does it cost? where do you get it? If it’s not a secret email me some details wouldya?

    thanks in advance!

    CalArch

    13 Feb 08 at 6:09 am

     

  16. its beneficial cause it provides 44 extra turbines of clean energy

    jones

    20 Feb 08 at 4:48 pm

     

  17. what would be the state of the people living in the building when the wind speed goes very high
    would they keep rotating with the wind?
    i would like to know if the architect has taken care about that fact
    well yes, it would solve the energy problem to an extent
    but i dont think the people residing in the building would like to rotate all the time

    sarita r.

    21 Feb 08 at 5:12 am

     

  18. talking about nishant’s query
    even during the industrial revolution it was predicted dat engineers would take over architects
    but no
    architects did prove that presumption wrong and have come up with far better ideas than engineers
    even in this case i think the architects wud succeed

    sarita r.

    21 Feb 08 at 5:16 am

     

  19. No answer……i know engineers have no answer for this statement. Sarita is quite right. Right now we as a whole are concerned with the problems of poverty. How can we thing of building such expensive buildings. we can use the same capital and assets for rehabilitating poor peaople and giving ‘em food nd stuf…
    Apart frm this TERRORISM being one of the gr8est threats to mankind…how can we think of building such high rise structures…which risks life of so many humans??

    Nishant Rai

    22 Feb 08 at 12:21 pm

     

  20. see nishant i appreciate ur concern for the poor n needy but dont u think its better to teach someone how to feed himself dan to keep feedin him all d time.
    Giving him food n stuff would never solve the prob of poverty
    n yes if u are talkin about terrorism
    after the sept 11 attack there had been a huge discussion about wether to continue building high rise buildings or stop it completely
    but architects took it as a challenge and decided to come up with structures which wud be able to resist huge impact
    so im very sure dat this building has taken that consideration into mind
    and yes it is goin to be expensive on the construction level
    but lots of expenses are goin to be cut out too
    like the labour required n the time to construct
    n once its been set up, it would take care of its own energy needs and even provide energy to the neighbourhood
    but then wat my real concern is dat
    since the building is on the move at all times
    would it be suitable for any kind of living conditions
    it would not be providin stability to the ppl livin in it
    they would be moving at all times

    sarita r.

    27 Feb 08 at 6:32 am

     

  21. if u are talkin about rahabilitatin poor people
    i think its the concern of the whole of the well to do and educated society
    our govt is spending on the upliftment of the poor but it never happens to reach the right hands
    we as individuals need to take up this concern
    we need to help the society grow
    everybody thinks that its the job of the govt to take care of these needs
    but who is the govt
    we just keep thinkin dat there someone to do it
    but who is goin to do it if no one takes the initiative

    sarita r.

    27 Feb 08 at 6:58 am

     

  22. marvellous idea! when i heard about it i become amaze..

    archi faiz

    23 Jun 08 at 11:22 am

     

  23. Amazing skyscraper!!I think that, that is the future of towers.It’s really dynamic,and from first view it’s very impressive!But I don’t have much info to discuss more for now …..Something really interesting (tha’s why I’m sayng tha this building is the future of skyscrapers)is that the building is ecological!

    Deyan Viktorov

    25 Jun 08 at 8:27 am

     

  24. wonder what kind of People will live in it ?

    Ahmed Eqbal Kureshi

    25 Jun 08 at 1:29 pm

     

  25. as a designer m just amazed wid the idea of rotatin building, its a real innovation. n somethin different for other ppl to learn frm….bt der r lot many other factors involved too…as follows

    though the building is very innoivative, excellent n ol bt wht abt safety of ppl… wht r the safety majors taken in consideration durin earthquake or ne other natural disasters? n if buildind keeps rotatin it wil surely affect the mental condition also of the ppl who r livin in(which is the psychological part- because ne structure is not only the structure it involves wid lotta things like, foundation material, its elevation, its surrounding, ppl who livin in- should be suitable for lyfestyle of human being- comfot level n ol dat)…. it just not abt the building, architect should keep in mind efects n affects beforehand… n even maitainance will be so so high, which “may” will be “difficult” in future to look aftr…

    bt though der r lotta queries m just wishin the whole team of dis project for best luck!

    dis Achr.David Fisher seems to be the person who is away frm crowd (i mean in thinking)
    n really achievers thinks differently…..

    Deepashri

    26 Jun 08 at 3:59 pm

     

  26. Interesting concept, innovative, but I am afraid it is not practical. I see lots of challenges that only lots and lots of money can solve. Dubai has so much money that they dont care. Longterm sustainability of this structure is going to be so expensive that I doubt it will generate any income. It is an art form, and probably will have to be treated as such. I am not sure about the environmental effects, I am worried about how many birds it will kill.

    Also the turbines will generate more wind, so the building will put out a windforce too. How will that effect the sorroundings? How will the spinning effect the residents? are they going to be disoriented? We have what you call a feeling of direction. the north, south, east, west is an internal orientation; an ever spining environment can have long term effects. Lots to consider.

    R. Evans

    27 Jun 08 at 12:53 pm

     

  27. I was actually thinking that the main discussion is more about how much this building will rotate according to the velocity of the wind? I mean if the building rotates very much just with low velocity wind, then it would most probably cause discomfort for the inhabitants. One of the concern of designing a building is considering Human Comfort. If a building causes discomfort, then it is a bad design, a design that should not have been built. I guess the architect should have already consider this point, which means the rotation of the building is slow, something like how much the Earth evolving ard the sun in a yr (365days, an evolution)? The rotation is so gradual such that we wont notice it until a certain amount of time passed? SInce there is some mentioning of ‘Time’ in architecture (Time in architecture refers very much to how Time changes the architecture, for example, weathering, stains due to rain over some time, walls covered by creeping plants etc.. THese are examples of how Time can be seen in architecture. It usually refers to a long period of time, like a yr, helf a decade, a decade or even longer.)

    The velocity of the wind at different terrain is different, taking into account the surrounding structures so all. If this dynamic building is built in a built up area, what’s the probability of it being able to rotate of the rotation of the building (for e.g.) 1 degree on the horizontal plane in a low velocity wind? The velocity of the wind the building will encounter at different floors and the rotation of the floors by the turbines on these floors hav to be carefully calculated and design in order to give a working dynamic architecture. It’s a lot of work!
    ANW, after reading what was posted, i have this thought that actually this design’s main intention is more of the architect wanting to make an architecture that rotates than really intending it to be ecological. It is undeniably an interesting idea, but i’ve seen even more amazing ideas by students, not published. And to really consider an architect’s main design intention to be ecological is when he is faced with an environmental problem to solve, such as the floating houses. Houses in a flood prone area (i think somewhere in europe, england? if i didnt rmb wrongly) are designed with a floating system that allows houses to float if flood strucks the area. So there is this urgent problem that needs to be solved, and thus, give rise to floating houses. However, as for this it is more like : Want to create a rotating architecture that wows people and then think of the mechanism, and then thought of the turbine and Then do some calculations AND Then lastly, ‘WA LA! the calculations show that it helps provide energy and all! It is (by accident) ECOLOGICAL!’

    N.A.

    30 Jun 08 at 12:36 pm

     

  28. How will water, gas, and waste go between a moving plumbing system to a stationary system. I am sure it can be done, but it must be a nice challenge. Electricity seems to be an easier issue.

    Good luch to Dr. David Fisher. Good “wayout thinking.”

    James Todd

    1 Jul 08 at 1:23 pm

     

  29. i don’t exactly know what are the benefits if these ferris-wheel floors?
    it’s really cool, but will it improve humanity?

    i really adore your idea, too ambitious…who knows, it will be be materialized someday(“,)

    oliver

    2 Jul 08 at 9:05 am

     

  30. I don’t know why all of guys are stresssing so much about motion sickness!the fact that the building can rotate has got nothing to do with generating electricty.The actual wind turbines is sutuated between floors and will have no effect on the dwelling units. From my interpretation of diagrams and sketches, the units will rotate by preferance, as per the occupants needs or mass coordination by the buildings body corporate.

    Leon

    9 Jul 08 at 9:16 am

     

  31. i think it s a wonderfull projekt,,,, dynamic architecture my favourites

    diti

    9 Jul 08 at 11:20 am

     

  32. hey,

    David Fisher talks that he is prefabricating the dynamic tower modules in a prefabrication factory outside Bary…does anybody know the name of this factory & the location of it?

    I would really appreciate if someone provides me with that info, I’m working on a research about prefabrication and would like to know more about this technique/method…thanks a lot…

    nEO

    Neo

    4 Aug 08 at 4:38 pm

     

  33. hey Leon,
    yeah ur right…it will rotate as needed and as planned…as a matter of fact, the rotation will, of course, use wind as a fuel but it doesn’t mean that if it is too windy outside the building will start spinning like crazy. As far as I’m concerned, the velocity of the wind will imply time only…I don’t think it will cause people to get dizzy or anything like that either since the structure/platform and walls themselves will be heavy enough (plus the insulation system) to fight gravitation…one more thing, I think I read somewhere in here: why tall buildings or skyscrapers? It is 100% related to lack of horizontal expansion…when you are limited horizontally the only way to optimize space is by adding modules one on top of another. hope this helps

    Neo

    4 Aug 08 at 6:49 pm

     

  34. though the entire idea of havins a rotatin bldin sounds really innovative n new
    but i really doubt its practicality
    will it be able to hold on to ppl’s imagination wen they start livin in it
    coz i think they will sooner or later start facing no of problems mentally n also physically
    the rotatin idea will sure affect the mental stability of the ppl
    n yes even the plumbing and sanitary adjustments of the bldin
    i wud really like the architect to explain how he has taken care of the various essential factors
    how is the circulation goin to be taken care of if the bldin is in contant movement

    sarita R

    7 Aug 08 at 4:54 am

     

  35. Sarita!
    i don’t get ur point, people’s imagination…mentally & also physically?? what do u mean by that? provide more content 2 ur comment plz!

    rotation won’t affect anybody at all, we’re always rotatin’; da earth rotates & we don’t even feel anything, I’m not comparing earth and buildings of course but I’d say it’s da same principle applied to something that involves gravitation.

    I might b talking 2 much tho, there are 2 2 3 dynamic buildings already & haven’t had any problems so far so, good if researched a bit into that…

    peace!

    Neo

    7 Aug 08 at 6:01 pm

     

  36. hey neo
    i dnt think dat u can in any way compare the rotation of the earth n dat of a bldin
    cmon dnt u think ppl livin in that bldin wud me affected if subjected to constant movement
    neways the bldin wud be ALWAYS movin!!!!!
    n i am sorry i din know dat al ready 2 2 3 blding exist
    if they do
    den why are ppl soo exited about this particular project
    i know i havent researched much
    y dnt u provide me wid some info about them
    or name the site where i can find some material on the subject
    i’d be really thankful

    sarita R

    8 Aug 08 at 11:52 am

     

  37. Sarita,

    http://www.professionearchitetto.it/news/en/news964.aspx
    that’s for the one in Brazil, Google it more tho…there is one more in Dubai but I lost the info I had but I am sure if you Google it as well you should be able to find it…

    my point out of all this is the prefabrication tho, I’m not concerned about the rotation and how they will supply power, water, and so on…I think prefabrication facilitates or makes things easier and faster, but most importantly, is the fact that you can save almost 35% in terms of costs…we should be able to deliver projects (residential and/or commercial buildings) for half of the current price and with the same or better construction standards…

    Neo

    11 Aug 08 at 2:35 pm

     

  38. when 1st time, i see. i really think that this is such a crazy idea. it’s awesome. but when i look closer i tRully impressed about the architect’s idea. THAT makes me want to know how fast that the building movement to make enough velocity but also still concern about the human comfort. does the wind turbine calculation from the building itself or it have the enviroment effect ? if the building also depend to the wind velocity from the enviroment, i wonder what will happen when around the building — full of high rise building. that mean the wind velocity will be different from the 1st time when it built. coz the fact that i know wind turbine always located in a place that have a high velocity.

    even that i amazed with the architect’s bravery. i don’t know how far that this building concern to the green buiidng. coz it has a lot of stadart to tell that the builidng is a green architecture. but i agree that the movement will decrease the sun heat that will effect to the building, especially when this building build in a place that have a lot of sun.

    hendry Sentoso

    16 Aug 08 at 1:06 pm

     

  39. It’s really cool & innovative… Cheers to innovations

    Dani

    21 Aug 08 at 11:25 am

     

  40. interesting idea – a good opportunity for engineers, architects, artists, etc. to work together

    Each group could work on the problems specific to their field but at the same time keep in constant communication with the other groups and learn to be conscious of each others goals

    rosalita

    26 Aug 08 at 3:28 pm

     

  41. I think it’s a great idea! The core would have to be stabilized and affixed to the ground/foundations it uses. The masses surrounding it would need to be heavy enough to withstand some of the wind power in order to rotate slowly enough that it is not felt by the avg person. The structure surrounding the core, holding the units up, would need to be intensively worked on and tested. It could be possible, but I am not sure how. Goodluck to you on your future endeavors!
    ~Ro

    Ronit

    29 Aug 08 at 1:32 am

     

  42. i am interesting to know and if possible get an information about how this dynamic tower work

    sukanto

    29 Aug 08 at 3:37 am

     

  43. I studied all comments specially Sarita and Nishant. I got they are in debat but it is not time of debating,it is time of searching solution to give birth to new architecture.I think Nishant gay didn’t understand the real meaning of architecture, listen!!!! in overal architecture is represention of human dynamic life so dynamic architecture is necessary today, even our earth is dynamic. So I heartly respect david sir’s concept.

    Gh.Nabin

    4 Sep 08 at 6:56 am

     

  44. i dont know why people are comparing rotation speed of turbine and individual floor, The floor does not rotate at the speed of turbine, you doesen even know that your floor is rotating.

    raaj

    13 Sep 08 at 12:42 pm

     

  45. sure nabin
    i too respect the idea
    but i wud actually like to know how the plumbin system is to be in the buildin
    would the pipes n all also be rotatin at all times
    n the people movin all day long
    its not that i am criticizin the design
    i jus want to be clear bout these ideas
    so dat if in future i want to pursue such a project i may be able to understand the base of it

    sarita R

    13 Sep 08 at 3:08 pm

     

  46. Not all gr8 ideas are accepted initially..!!
    it takes a lot of courage 2 visualize something like this and the most difficult part is to execute it..!!
    one who dares 2 dream differently can only do gr8 things..!!
    I really appreciate the architect Mr.David Fisher for this idea…and i wish him all the best to make it practical and prove it to the world..!!!
    Defnitely, when the architect got an idea of dynamic architecture…he might have thought of other issues as well…like the wind velocity, rotation factors, impact on the occupants, services etc..all these factors cohesively thought of can only give an output of such a concept..!!
    I believe this will change the present scenaro of architecture and give new forms and definitions to the space..!!!
    It will be a revolution and an important phase of the architecture history..if executed with proper care and intricate detailing of energy issues as well..!!
    My congratulations to Mr.David Fisher for visualising something out of the box…!!

    Srishti

    14 Sep 08 at 2:49 am

     

  47. i think sarita is very correct in her query
    even i would like to be clarified about the whole idea about services
    though the whole thinking has really been absolutely extraordinary
    but these things happen to strike my mind
    it wud be really helpful if these factors are clarified

    azeen rosh

    15 Sep 08 at 1:33 pm

     

  48. if this become posssible to generate power for a building why cant we apply the same for roads and fuelfree transportation….let the precious architect rule d entire arena soon………..

    sangeetha

    16 Sep 08 at 10:41 am

     

  49. this is really an out of the box architecture n v must learn from our past(wer wvry new inventoion was generally ridiculed) n support such endeavours… atleast its an innovative idea which could pave way for a breakthrough in architecture….

    ninja

    23 Sep 08 at 3:05 pm

     

  50. it is a nice concept but not feasible…

    manjari

    26 Sep 08 at 8:17 am

     

  51. very nice and attractive pictures…..

    PreethaRamasamy

    2 Oct 08 at 3:22 am

     

  52. I’ve always wanted to be an architect. But my dad said that some times architects don’t focus and get all caught up in theyre ideas that they dont do the diminsions right.

    Jessie Fouard

    6 Oct 08 at 3:40 pm

     

  53. It is not only your question Sarita. Many people asking about plumbing n wireing. I dont know exactly how they arrange plumbing, electric wireing n common circulation space, but i think it is not great problems for them. If there was problemsin plumbing,they would not lunch such preview of dynamic icon.
    It is 100 percent different in terms of rotation n clean energy production.If we see the history of making building, there are many story but except shelter wat did it give?,to this point Nishant n kennon B williams cant comment.
    Many people belive that architecture is not a goal but it should support the objectives of the business but now we have to think one more cuz this truth can changed, architecture can be goal.

    Gh. Nabin

    7 Oct 08 at 8:19 am

     

  54. great idea ^^

    well,, since ‘nothings’s impossible’.. i think this buildingis a great invention,, juz wait to be happen n realized.

    Shui

    13 Oct 08 at 1:55 am

     

  55. la primera imagen es subliminal, tiene una cara de diablo encachonado wei!…

    perroguacho

    17 Oct 08 at 12:42 am

     

  56. absolutely bloody mazing id love to meet the architect id pay a billion quid for an apartment in this place its unique not to mention it’ll look awsome

    James

    28 Oct 08 at 9:40 pm

     

  57. Great ideas isn’t folks! Whether we give good and bad comments about the design….still consider a magnificent idea. What is important now is we have already reach the milestone where an opening door to all great designers in this world that we can do possible things beyond our imagination…….so start doing ur work for the betterment of mankind without dangering one’s life.

    Manuel

    31 Oct 08 at 8:31 am

     

  58. Im very much agreed with mr. nishant rai
    will this structure give the comfort to the people
    if this is a commercial build then i think this will not work
    nd if this is residential build then also it cant give comfort
    to the people resting, as a human cant sleep in a rotating motion

    vivek painuli

    6 Nov 08 at 2:36 am

     

  59. why should the building rotate? It will just make the users lazy… everything moves with just one click! Buildings should also consider that human beings have hands and feet! Why not just provide the windows on all side and let the user explore it by himself! If all building were to be built this way in the future surely humans will have a shorter life span! Yes, the building is surely hi-tech and all… but people are also nature… we are the ones to be considered first!

    mudz

    22 Jan 09 at 9:24 pm

     

  60. i think david fisher had a great idea; it’s a big revolution
    i am studing about it for a school project
    does anybody can help me to understand how the floors rotate, i don’t talk about wind turbine;i know the centre of the tower doesn’t rotate, so how each floors rotate?

    sorry i don’t speak english very well because i am french
    thanks for ur help

    pritha

    1 Feb 09 at 1:47 pm

     

  61. i studied all the comment,surely i agree with sarita’s comment how people stay,live and do their work and plummbing system, wiring system etc…and challeng of architecte for new inovation but i like to say for u that why are u afraid with these element on rotating building, surely all the element in the buildig will be rotate as the building be rotate, as u know that , now also all the building are also rotating due to the rotation of the earth but we didnt feel, i think if the rotating velocity is managed in such a way that it will be pssible,The reduction of effective gravity by the Earth’s rotation,and and doing on research on rotational motion of building and its impact will finally produced a solution…so all things that u have said will be exist…
    1. all objects are in orbit of some kind.
    2. all orbiting objects experience torques that tend to cause the object to face the centre of rotation (which gives the object rotation about its own centre of mass)
    3. These torques can only be resisted by gyroscopic forces, which means that the object must be rotating about its axis

    poudel basu

    13 Mar 09 at 1:42 am

     

  62. I have a few question about the building; is the rotation of the building effect the surrounding environment? its glare, its energy lost effect our body? or is there some kind of radiation from the building that came from the turbine? i would like to hear some comments, for my research purpose on my desertation proposal. thanks.

    anson diem

    23 Mar 09 at 3:38 pm

     

  63. Undoubtedly a great innovation……….may easily have evolved a new dimension in architecture …..
    But I seriously do not agree with some comments left previously ….which states about the improvement the building is going to bring 2 mankind ………
    If sumone has some innovations he/she must try it out ….THIS BUILDING IS NOT GONNA B BUILT AT DA COST OF MANKIND ………..
    I wud jus love 2 ask wat development has Mr. Nishant Rai or Sarita R. done 2 mankind till date ……..and xactly wat r the deliverables they think should be for any building (so that they can b tagged as a BUILDING 4 THE MANKIND)………
    For any body who does not have a proper knowledge of the building should know that the speed of rotation of the floors are not equal 2 wind velocity ……..floors r going to rotate very slowly ………none inside is hardly going 2 feel it …..
    One noticing at may be 5 different times of the day will b able 2 perceive the different forms the building is gonna attain ………
    Moreover I wud love 2 request 2 people not 2 leave absurd and antediluvian comments without much researching about the topic ……….
    Hail David Fischer………..

    Alikzander Zhirkov

    30 Mar 09 at 7:17 am

     

  64. dear alikzander
    well we all appreciate the very idea of david fisher..
    but why dont u just explain the very functioning of the building..(instead of commenting on oder’s comment n calling it absurd)
    no body has even reached to answer the query.. how will the services be taken care of
    obviouslyy there are going to be service pipes n ducts inside the building
    do we expect them to be rotating all the time if so den how will it be finally connected to the firm ground
    wenn all of it is rotating all d time

    azeen rosh

    11 Apr 09 at 8:17 am

     

  65. will it ever get rusty enough to stop rotating and fall over?

    anonymous

    27 May 09 at 2:52 pm

     

  66. I do not think it will work on a mass scale, its too impractical in the end, the rotation just to have a good view would only go as a reason so far, what about safety, utilities, even the health factor is at play, it might cause disorientation, seasickness, not to mention something more serious.

    tereda

    15 Dec 09 at 6:05 pm

     

  67. The utility systems problem.
    The vertical transport problem.
    suppose 1 floor owner “chased” the Dubai sun from 9am-12noon.that would be…let’s say a quarter change from the floor’s first orientation.
    Emergency calls.
    how long will it take to reposition the owner’s access to the nearest/next elevator?

    Good concept anyway. It challenges Friedrich von Schelling’s “archiutecture is frozen music” experience.

    baal

    19 Dec 09 at 2:29 am

     

  68. ahem .. i like mr anonymous’s query .. about rusting and falling over!!:-)

    azeen rosh

    22 Feb 10 at 2:38 pm

     


 

Leave a Reply